503-785-3485
bill@conerlyconsulting.com
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Conerly Consulting Conerly Consulting
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Business Strategy
  • Peanut Butter Manifesto

Business Strategy

18 Nov 2006

Peanut Butter Manifesto

  • By Bill Conerly
  • In Business Strategy

The Wall Street Journal describes today an internal paper being circulated at Yahoo called The Peanut Butter Manifesto (subscription required).  The paper covers a lot of ground, but one key point generates the name.  Yahoo, according to senior vice president Brad Garlinghouse, is spreading its resources evenly across activities:  "… a thin layer of investment spread across everything we do and thus we focus on nothing in particular."

Corporations do this on both the upside and the downside.  Moving up, everyone gets some resources for new projects.  If Al and Betty and Chuck all have their projects funded, then it seems unfair not to fund David and Evelyn.  On the downside, cross-the-board budget cuts treat all activities as equally overstaffed.

I want to both agree and disagree with this concept.  (The Lord gave me two hands, and I’m going to use both of them.)  Agreement:  obviously.  Some projects have to be more important than others.  Some projects have the potential to be blockbusters.  Fund them commensurately with their potential, and their risk.  This is so obvious, why does any successful corporation have a problem here?  The challenge is in executive decision making.  Picking winners means telling others that they are not winners–which means "losers" even if we don’t use those words.  Who wants to tell a loyal, talented subordinate that his or her project just isn’t worthy of large support?  When times are good, the corporate leader often defaults to giving some money to all half-way decent projects.

Corporate executives deserve to be paid big bucks–but only if they are making the hard decisions.  If they are expending large amounts of cash just to avoid a confrontation with a subordinate, they are not doing their job, do not deserve high pay, and actually drain the resources and future of the company.  Buck up, walk like a man (or whatever the gender-neutral version of that saying is), do th job you’re paid to do.

Here’s the disagreement:  lots of small, low-potential projects should be funded.  I’m not saying to spread the peanut butter evenly, but make sure that every bit of the bread has at least a little bit of peanut butter on it.  Here’s why.  Nobody does a great job of seeing the future. Take it from a professional forecaster, the world is very complicated, with huge changes in technology and society that no one can accurately predict.  The way to thrive in such a world is to be have a little bit invested in many different activities.  Microsoft has been a master of this strategy.  See a new technology or market area, laugh at the oversized goals of the little players in the little arena–but buy a piece.  Keep an eye on it.  Check in to see how the technology is developing, how the market is growing.  Occasionally you’ll find that one little crumb has developed into a whole loaf of bread.  You want to own that loaf, not stare at it in someone else’s parking lot.

Business Strategy Implications:  Do not spread your resources evenly over all activities.  But in avoiding that mistake, don’t neglect small projects that could possibly, even if unlikely, develop into major profit centers.

  • Share:
Bill Conerly

Search

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

View Latest Issue

RSS Bill’s Forbes Articles

  • The Labor Market Is Tight Despite High Unemployment February 19, 2021
    Finding workers is hard despite the high unemployment rate, because many jobless folks don't match the skills needed, don't want to shift occupations or prefer to collect unemployment. Business focus on retention should be top priority.

Testimonials

Dr. Conerly’s presentation and view of the economic conditions impacting the world of business is insightful and thought-provoking. His analysis and presentation style is audience focused and engaging, leading to the efficient development of follow-up activities by those in attendance.
Paul Ulrich, The Inteplast Group (plastic bags)
You made a complicated global picture understandable. I have received many favorable comments from those in attendance. I frequently heard comments like ‘Now I understand’ or ‘Wow, now I get it’ and ‘He was great to listen to. Thanks for bringing Bill to our meeting.’
Pete Van Sickle, Idaho Department of Lands
Your talk and its message stuck with people.
David Crowell, after presentation to National Rural Electrical Cooperative Association
Seems no matter where I go, I hear you talking – and always doing a great job with different material well tailored to the audience. Very impressive!
Alan Shiffer, World Vision
The ratings you received from our banker evaluations were among the highest I’ve seen, which matched my impressions exactly. Your presentation style is quite engaging, you bring interesting and valuable content, and our ability to interact in a stimulating way during “Q&A” sessions makes you a valuable addition to any meeting agenda. As a bonus, you are a genuinely enjoyable participant in conference activities beyond your presentation.
Steve Yeakel, Montana Independent Bankers
Every time you spoke, we got business.
Chris Rasmussen, Washington Trust Bank, Bank of the Northwest
Bill did a great job. We look forward to a continuing relationship.
John Hamburger, Franchise Times
We asked Bill Conerly to look at one of the major factors limiting the growth of our business. He pulled together data from a wide range of sources, as well as his own extensive business knowledge, to give us an insight into when conditions would improve and how we could be ready to capitalize on better times. He did so in a straight forward, easy to understand manner. A year later it was clear that things had evolved just as he had forecast. Ever since then he’s been my go-to guy on how the e…
Len Ludwig, former CEO, Vencore Capital LLC
You are a master at your craft and a favorite of our audience.
Jim Parker, UBS Financial Services
Thank you for a wonderful presentation. Everyone who heard your presentation was impressed with your analysis, and strong command of facts and theory. More importantly, your ability to weave together substance with humor, in a very dynamic way, meant our attendees learned and retained more information than we would have typically expected. You made economics fun and you left our members with powerful insights on trends and issues to consider as they prepare for the future.
John Aguirre, Oregon Association of Nurseries

Get in touch

(503) 785-3485

bill@conerlyconsulting.com

PO Box 2188
Lake Oswego, OR 97035

Useful Links

  • Consulting
  • Speaking
  • Videos
  • Blog
  • Press
  • Contact

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Newsletters

Copyright 2020 Conerly Consulting LLC