503-785-3485
bill@conerlyconsulting.com
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Conerly Consulting Conerly Consulting
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Housing Vacancy Still Waaaaaay Too High

Economy

29 Jan 2008

Housing Vacancy Still Waaaaaay Too High

  • By Bill Conerly
  • In Economy
  • 5 comments
  • We built more housing than we needed. 
  • We still have too much housing. 
  • We’re not working off the excess very fast. 

(Underlying data released today here.)

Vacowned_2

Current vacancy of non-rental  housing units is 2.8 percent.  To my eye, a generous estimate of "normal" vacancy is 1.7 percent.  That difference, on a base of 78 million housing units, translates to 0.86 million too many non-rental housing units.  (On the chart, changes from thick to thin lines show changes in definition by the Census Bureau.)

Vacrental

Current vacancy is 9.6 percent; normal is 8.0 percent, on a base of 40 million units, for an excess of 0.64 units.

Total excess housing units in the United States:  1.5 million units.  (That’s not a high precision estimate, but the true number, if it could be determined, is at least 1.3 million units, I think.)

Annual demand for new housing from population growth, change in family size, and second homes: about 1.4 million units (my estimate).  Average number of "losses," which includes tear-downs:  0.3 million units.  The losses are very volatile, but let’s be generous and say that we need 0.3 million just to replace deteriorated housing stock.  Annual new demand for housing is 1.7 million units.

If homebuilders took 10 1/2 months off, we’d have supply-demand balance nationally.

I know, it’s not a national market but rather a bunch of local markets, and you cannot move housing from areas of excess to areas of demand.  However, we obviously have too much housing in total, and that means that much of the country must also have too much housing.  The recent declines in new housing construction are not enough.  Look for another year of falling new construction and falling prices.

Now, would you like to hear some good news?  . . . .  I’m still thinking.  . . . . nothing yet . . . . well, how about this: the rest of the economy will not necessarily go into the tank along with residential construction.  Sorry, that’s the best I could do.

  • Share:
Bill Conerly

    Comments

  1. LJR
    January 29, 2008

    Looks like the y axis of the first graph is mislabeled. Shouldn’t that read “percent of all houses”?

  2. Bill Conerly
    January 30, 2008

    LJR, good eye. That y label for the upper chart should be percent of all non-rental housing.
    Thanks, Bill

  3. Tom Canavan Pelham, NC
    January 30, 2008

    “and you cannot move housing from areas of excess to areas of demand. ”
    actually you can and should. On the subject of tear downs, according to the EPA there are about 300,000 a year, each has a median value of $225,000 (apppx) for a total wasted opportunity to recycle, create jobs and help the housing market recover of over $67 Billion.
    Contact The Benefactor Project. We want all of the houses America wants to tear down to create jobs and homeownership opportunities for those without them.
    Thanks
    Tom Canavan
    http://www.thebenefactorproject.com

  4. Wayne Pruner
    January 30, 2008

    I agree that inventory of housing needs to be reduced before prices stabilize. Interest rates dropped below 5% today. That should help move some houses. I hope there are some smart investors taking advantage of this opprotunity.
    I appreciate your stab at some good news. It’s still pretty bleak out there.

  5. Laurence Hunt
    February 4, 2008

    Bill Fleckenstein has a nice analysis of this problem. 1. Central bank profligacy created a housing bubble. 2. Too many people bought homes they can’t afford. 3. In many cases, home equity is now declining; not uncommonly it is negative for homes purchased at the peak of the bubble. 4. Prices will adjust to what people can afford to pay – that will be lower, and much lower in some regions. 5. Homebuilding will not be a good business for probably many years to come.

Comments are closed.

Search

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

View Latest Issue

RSS Bill’s Forbes Articles

  • Trade Shows Will Regain Importance After The Covid-19 Pandemic March 1, 2021
    The benefits of exhibiting will help trade shows and conventions to resume, though with some changes.

Testimonials

Bill was a great resource in helping us develop our business model and has continued to be a great advisor as we have refined it and successfully entered the marketplace.
John Courtney, CEO, NextJob, Inc.
It can be difficult to find economists who provide good substantive information who are also entertaining and engaging. I received many enthusiastic comments about Dr. Conerly from members and others in the audience.
Molly Steckel, Idaho Telecom Alliance
Bill’s presentation was neatly balanced…rich with content.. and our audience really enjoyed his humor.
Bing Sheldon, SERA Architects
Dr. Conerly’s presentation and view of the economic conditions impacting the world of business is insightful and thought-provoking. His analysis and presentation style is audience focused and engaging, leading to the efficient development of follow-up activities by those in attendance.
Paul Ulrich, The Inteplast Group (plastic bags)
Every time you spoke, we got business.
Chris Rasmussen, Washington Trust Bank, Bank of the Northwest
Your presentation was right on the mark. I received more positive comments about you than any other presenter. We would not hesitate to recommend you to others or have you back for an encore performance.
Bob Russell, Oregon Trucking Association
Bill Conerly is one of the most interesting and engaging speakers I have ever heard. The fact that he is a very funny man is a bonus.
James A. Kronenberg, Oregon Medical Association
Bill did a great job! There were many in the audience who liked him and many in the audience who loved him! Bill shared pertinent and timely information with our audience of commercial real estate professionals and added interesting stories and a funny sense of humor twist.
Jana Knoll, BOMA Boise
Bill is a delight and easy to work with. The client thought he was great and delivered value to their group. I would definitely recommend Bill.
Andrea Gold, Gold Stars Speakers Bureau
You are a master at your craft and a favorite of our audience.
Jim Parker, UBS Financial Services

Get in touch

(503) 785-3485

bill@conerlyconsulting.com

PO Box 2188
Lake Oswego, OR 97035

Useful Links

  • Consulting
  • Speaking
  • Videos
  • Blog
  • Press
  • Contact

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Newsletters

Copyright 2020 Conerly Consulting LLC