503-785-3485
bill@conerlyconsulting.com
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Conerly Consulting Conerly Consulting
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Consulting
    • Approach/Philosophy
    • Sounding Board
    • Economics and Business Strategy
    • Assessment
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Speaking
    • The Package
    • Topics
    • Testimonials
  • Writing
    • Businomics Newsletter
    • Businomics
    • The Flexible Stance
    • Blog
  • Industries
    • Banking/Finance
    • Manufacturing
    • Other Industries
  • Video
    • Speaking
    • Event Promotion
    • Business Planning
  • About
    • News Coverage
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Public Policy
  • Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis: Caused by Lack of Regulations?

Public Policy

26 Sep 2008

Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis: Caused by Lack of Regulations?

  • By Bill Conerly
  • In Public Policy
  • 4 comments

Did lack of regulation create the subprime mortgage
crisis?  I’m asked this all the
time.  The short answer:  Of course not.  Nowhere close.  Not a
chance.  Here’s the long answer.

 

What regulations have we had?  The mortgage originator—your local bank or mortgage broker—was
under regulations not to discriminate and to inform you of your interest
rate.  Those papers you signed without
reading?  Many of them were “Truth in
Lending” disclosures designed to protect you from getting into something you
didn’t understand.  However, if you
didn’t read them, maybe they didn’t protect you.

 

But you were not the one lending money to a borrower
incapable or unwilling to pay the money back. 
That was your banker.  He was not
regulated because he didn’t have any risk. 
He immediately turned around and sold your loan, along with a thousand
other loans, to a Wall Street investment bank, which formed the many mortgages
into a mortgage backed security or a “collateralized debt obligation.”

 

There were no regulations protecting Wall Street investment
bankers from lending deadbeats money. 
The idea is that they are smart enough, sophisticated enough, to take
care of themselves.  (That turned out to
be a bad idea, but it was the idea behind the lack of regulation.)

 

How did these rich, sophisticated investors make such a huge
mistake?  First they experimented.  They tried small variations from the old
traditional loans.  Variations like
adjustable rate mortgages.  Low-down-payment
mortgages.  No documentation
mortgages.  (How else would strippers
who make their living from tips be able to borrow money?) 

 

These experiments worked well.  Surprisingly well. 
Why?  Because it was a rising
real estate market.  Borrowers who were
unable to make their payments simply sold their homes at a profit.  No big deal, and no default or foreclosure
on the mortgage.

 

The crucial mistake that Wall Street made was extrapolating
from the good times to the bad times. 
They assumed that these subprime mortgages would be good all the time
because they had been good in the rising house market.  Oops.

 

Would more regulation have helped?  Maybe we could have protected Wall Street investment bankers from
themselves.  Maybe with good regulations
they would not have to give up their summer homes in the Hamptons.  Maybe.

 

In reality, regulatory policy has worked in the opposite
direction.  The government wanted more
risky loans made, not less.  For
example, the Community Reinvestment Act pressured banks to make loans in poor
neighborhoods.  Banks (and I was a
banker under the CRA) figured that making some bad loans was just another tax.,
a cost of doing business as a regulated company.  In 1995, the Clinton administration revised the CRA to increase
pressure on banks to make more loans to risky borrowers.  In 1997, the first pool of subprime
mortgages was securitized (by Bear Stearns!)

 

The law regulating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was rewritten
to reduce their capital requirements, meaning they would become riskier.  Some critics were concerned about the risk,
but here’s what the distinguished Congressman Barney Frank had to say at the
time:


''These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are
not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The
more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these
companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''

New York Times,
September 11, 2003

At the height of the real estate boom, the United States set
record home ownership rates. 
Politicians, including President Bush, bragged about their success at
getting Americans into their own homes. 
As recently as August 2007, the President bragged that he was helping
Americans get homes with lower down payments and higher loan limits.  He also signed a lay making it easier for
homeowners to walk away from their mortgage obligations.

 

Would more regulation have reduced the number of bad loans
made?  Most likely, more regulation
would have increased the problem.

  • Share:
Bill Conerly

    Comments

  1. Jim
    September 29, 2008

    Thanks for the detailed analysis of the mortgage situation of our country. The mortgage rate charts show the true picture of recent mortgage situation. Have a look at
    mortgage rate. But my question is, when the situation will be better so that people like us can get a relief.

  2. Bill D
    October 11, 2008

    I agree with Bill here with one exception. The originator (i.e., the lender or broker who works with the borrower) needs to be more substantially licensed, and capitalized or bonded. To buy $500k of life insurance, or to buy $500k of stock or bonds, you must work with a licensed, regulated individual, supervised by another licensed individual. This gives at least some hope that the purchaser has been advised and informed about the nature of the product, and that the borrower is making a somewhat informed choice.
    To get a $500k home loan you can work with Bob, a mortgage broker who was hanging drywall last year and who will be a plumber next year (no insult to drywallers or plumbers intended).
    I agree with Bill that lenders, Wall Street types and institutional investors can fend for themselves. But borrowers need better protection.

  3. home loans
    December 17, 2008

    This was a good article about what’s going on in the mortgage world. Thanks

  4. Zetscheeque
    February 16, 2009

    airline tickets chea

Comments are closed.

Search

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

View Latest Issue

RSS Bill’s Forbes Articles

  • Inflation Has Not Shown Up Yet, But It’s Coming February 25, 2021
    Inflation is muted, but not for long. Inflation is coming in the next two years, then will be followed by a boom/bust business cycle, or maybe two.

Testimonials

You are a master at your craft and a favorite of our audience.
Jim Parker, UBS Financial Services
Bill Conerly is one of the most interesting and engaging speakers I have ever heard. The fact that he is a very funny man is a bonus.
James A. Kronenberg, Oregon Medical Association
Seems no matter where I go, I hear you talking – and always doing a great job with different material well tailored to the audience. Very impressive!
Alan Shiffer, World Vision
The ratings you received from our banker evaluations were among the highest I’ve seen, which matched my impressions exactly. Your presentation style is quite engaging, you bring interesting and valuable content, and our ability to interact in a stimulating way during “Q&A” sessions makes you a valuable addition to any meeting agenda. As a bonus, you are a genuinely enjoyable participant in conference activities beyond your presentation.
Steve Yeakel, Montana Independent Bankers
Dr. Bill Conerly opened our Ace Hardware Platinum Retailer Conference by helping our independent small business owners understand the current state of the economy in a straight forward and humorous manner that connected very well with the retailers I spoke with. Dr. Conerly provided information our retailers can use to lead their businesses. He connected with the audience and made a complicated topic understandable.
Mike Berschauer, Ace Hardware Corp
Your talk and its message stuck with people.
David Crowell, after presentation to National Rural Electrical Cooperative Association
Every time you spoke, we got business.
Chris Rasmussen, Washington Trust Bank, Bank of the Northwest
As you know, it can be difficult to find economists who provide good substantive information who are so entertaining and engaging. I received many enthusiastic comments from members and others in attendance. I was very pleased with Dr. Conerly and have recommended him to NCSTAE, our national organization.
Molly Steckel, Idaho Telecom Alliance
Bill’s presentation was neatly balanced…rich with content.. and our audience really enjoyed his humor.
Bing Sheldon, SERA Architects
AgFirst Farm Credit Bank has benefitted from Bill Conerly’s unique insights and perspectives several times over the past five years…his materials consistently cover the points that we agree on…he has been very well-received by our groups, and we look forward to having Bill with us again in the future.
Ronnie Hucks, AgFirst Farm Credit, Columbia

Get in touch

(503) 785-3485

bill@conerlyconsulting.com

PO Box 2188
Lake Oswego, OR 97035

Useful Links

  • Consulting
  • Speaking
  • Videos
  • Blog
  • Press
  • Contact

Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Newsletters

Copyright 2020 Conerly Consulting LLC